All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
1 / 13@keen_pulsar_80 · Owner-reported
Owned 1–6 months · Still using it: sometimes · Posted
The outer shell of these earbuds don't fit well with my very small outer-ear bowl, the treble of the Harman curve is too overwhelming to me, so I had to use an EQ and the silicone OEM eartips completely tore apart
@curious_rowan_20 · Owner-reported
Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
That SSC uhq thing only works on S series
@amber_prairie_71 · Owner-reported
Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: no, stopped · Posted
Eartip problems are not solved, to charge the buds you need to press hard to case. Build quality is terrible, lights are useless after trying them.
Own it? Your review joins these
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying · Sign-in needed to publish · Photo optional
At 7.6, its noise cancelling beats 41% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 93 of the 265 we've cataloged.
A 4.8 puts its audio quality in the top half of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 64 of the 265 we've cataloged.
2 of 5 would buy again. 3 of 5 still use it daily, 1 sometimes, 1 stopped.
Owned 1–6 months to over 2 years.
What gave out: Ear tips (2)
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 249 of 265 we've cataloged.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 247 of 265 we've cataloged.
IP57 appears on 5% of the 244 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 265).
Adaptive appears on 7% of the 178 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 265).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Frequency Response (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 8.2 |
| 25 | 8.4 |
| 32 | 8.2 |
| 40 | 7.9 |
| 50 | 7.6 |
| 63 | 7.0 |
| 80 | 6.1 |
| 100 | 5.0 |
| 125 | 3.6 |
| 160 | 1.7 |
| 200 | 0.9 |
| 250 | -0.4 |
| 315 | -2.7 |
| 400 | -4.7 |
| 500 | -3.8 |
| 630 | -1.6 |
| 800 | -2.1 |
| 1000 | -2.1 |
| 1250 | -1.0 |
| 1600 | 1.1 |
| 2000 | 3.3 |
| 2500 | 5.9 |
| 3150 | 6.7 |
| 4000 | 6.5 |
| 5000 | 7.4 |
| 6300 | 9.1 |
| 8000 | 7.9 |
| 10000 | 2.7 |
| 12500 | -3.1 |
| 16000 | -1.1 |
| 20000 | -18.3 |
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Attenuation (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Solid lines: passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Dashed lines: total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | -10.3 |
| 26 | -8.4 |
| 33 | 0.7 |
| 41 | 1.0 |
| 52 | 1.3 |
| 65 | 1.8 |
| 82 | 1.9 |
| 103 | 2.1 |
| 130 | 1.7 |
| 163 | 2.8 |
| 205 | 3.9 |
| 259 | 4.8 |
| 325 | 4.5 |
| 410 | 5.0 |
| 516 | 4.8 |
| 613 | 5.7 |
| 772 | 10.3 |
| 972 | 12.6 |
| 1220 | 13.5 |
| 1540 | 15.6 |
| 1940 | 19.7 |
| 2440 | 24.1 |
| 3070 | 30.1 |
| 3870 | 26.1 |
| 4870 | 23.5 |
| 6130 | 21.2 |
| 7720 | 27.5 |
| 9720 | 31.6 |
| 12200 | 25.9 |
| 15400 | 27.1 |
| 19400 | 30.9 |
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | -7.9 |
| 26 | -4.5 |
| 33 | 2.4 |
| 41 | 7.5 |
| 52 | 11.7 |
| 65 | 16.9 |
| 82 | 21.7 |
| 103 | 26.0 |
| 130 | 30.1 |
| 163 | 34.8 |
| 205 | 32.1 |
| 259 | 27.8 |
| 325 | 21.1 |
| 410 | 16.5 |
| 516 | 18.9 |
| 613 | 19.3 |
| 772 | 16.2 |
| 972 | 22.1 |
| 1220 | 25.4 |
| 1540 | 25.9 |
| 1940 | 30.8 |
| 2440 | 29.8 |
| 3070 | 29.9 |
| 3870 | 22.4 |
| 4870 | 16.6 |
| 6130 | 8.3 |
| 7720 | 20.3 |
| 9720 | 30.6 |
| 12200 | 22.8 |
| 15400 | 22.3 |
| 19400 | 25.7 |
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro MDAQS
Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores, Scale 1 - 5
Virtual mean opinion scores (MOS) on a 1–5 scale, modeled from the measured response by HEAD acoustics’ MDAQS (Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Score) model. Higher is better across timbre, distortion, and immersiveness — add other models to see where this one lands.
The verdict
With a Samsung phone, these earbuds are competent competitors to the rest of the market. However, if you have an iPhone or non-Samsung Android phone, you may be able to find a better value elsewhere.
✓Liked: Companion app, IP57, Sound quality, Easy to fit
✕Could be better: Samsung-specific features, Somewhat poor ANC, Controls, Battery life
What readers who own the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro report after living with it. Owner-reported, checked before publishing; ordered photo-verified first, then newest.
Owner reviews are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not rewritten by us: at most we proofread typos, which is shown on the review’s own page and which the author can undo. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from owner reviews.
5 owner reviews
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 1–6 months · Still using it: sometimes · Posted
Would not buy againThe outer shell of these earbuds don't fit well with my very small outer-ear bowl, the treble of the Harman curve is too overwhelming to me, so I had to use an EQ and the silicone OEM eartips completely tore apart
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againThat SSC uhq thing only works on S series
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: no, stopped · Posted
Would not buy againEartip problems are not solved, to charge the buds you need to press hard to case. Build quality is terrible, lights are useless after trying them.
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would not buy againStarted cracking after 6 months, were from the initial pre order batch. Sometimes charging does not happen due to connector pins not aligning in case. Sound is good, but ANC is not
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againI have been dailying buds 3 pro since late May 2025 and my main issues are the battery of the case for the last couple months has been a lot worse I would say it might have even went down to 22-23 hours and the case has a lot of scratches and some color deformation/grayish edges
Sign-in needed to publish.
What readers ask about the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, answered by the people who own it.
Nobody has asked the owners yet.
Ask the first question →Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.
Adam BirneyManaging EditorSamsung, it's time to make an AirPods Max competitorI love my Galaxy Buds, but I want the sound and comfort of a pair of headphones.
Zac Kew-DennissThe Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro's ecosystem lock-in only hurts itselfHead gestures, Ultra High-Quality audio, and ultra-wideband calls require a compatible Samsung phone.
Tom TriggsContributorThe 5 best headphones to look forward to in 2026Strap in — we're in for a wild year.Tom TriggsContributorBest Earbuds Prime Day Deals October 2025Looking for the best Prime Day earbuds deals this October? We’ve tested the top options — here are our top four picks, for all budgets.
Chase BernathBrand & Partnerships ManagerPhone-specific features suck. Here's whyHeadphone manufacturers are marching to the same somber beat.Tom TriggsContributorHow long should your earbuds last? Our battery tests have the answerEarbuds don't last long, but how much is enough?
Christian ThomasEditor-at-large
1 of 2 would buy again
2 owners
The battery beat their expectations
Comfort beat their expectations
1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from comfort
2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners · owners report ~10 h per charge vs 8.73 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
The battery beat their expectations
0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations
0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from the noise cancelling
2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners
The battery beat their expectations
The battery beat their expectations
1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · owners report ~7 h per charge vs 10 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
