

All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
1 / 8A 3 puts its noise isolation in the bottom quarter of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 132 of the 259 we've cataloged.
A 2 puts its audio quality in the bottom 10% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 61 of the 259 we've cataloged.
No one has reported on this pair yet.
Be the first. We ask a few quick questions about living with it, then check the note before publishing.
Own the SHOKZ OpenFit 2?
Be the first owner to write in — three answers, four quick reads, shown under a pseudonym.
above average for wireless earbuds — based on 241 of 259 we've cataloged.
above average for wireless earbuds — based on 239 of 259 we've cataloged.
IP55 appears on 16% of the 238 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 259).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | -37.0 |
| 25 | -46.4 |
| 32 | -40.0 |
| 40 | -28.0 |
| 50 | -16.0 |
| 63 | -6.5 |
| 80 | -2.4 |
| 100 | -2.9 |
| 125 | -2.7 |
| 160 | -1.8 |
| 200 | -2.9 |
| 250 | -3.4 |
| 315 | -2.9 |
| 400 | -1.8 |
| 500 | -0.8 |
| 630 | -0.1 |
| 800 | 0.1 |
| 1000 | 0.0 |
| 1250 | 0.3 |
| 1600 | 2.1 |
| 2000 | 4.6 |
| 2500 | 6.6 |
| 3150 | 1.9 |
| 4000 | 5.7 |
| 5000 | 5.4 |
| 6300 | -0.2 |
| 8000 | -4.6 |
| 10000 | -6.4 |
| 12500 | -6.8 |
| 16000 | -12.0 |
| 20000 | -24.2 |
Passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 2.4 |
| 26 | -0.1 |
| 33 | 0.1 |
| 41 | 0.1 |
| 52 | 0.0 |
| 65 | 0.0 |
| 82 | 0.0 |
| 103 | 0.0 |
| 130 | -0.0 |
| 163 | -0.0 |
| 205 | -0.0 |
| 259 | -0.1 |
| 325 | -0.1 |
| 410 | -0.1 |
| 516 | -0.1 |
| 613 | -0.2 |
| 772 | -0.3 |
| 972 | -0.4 |
| 1220 | -0.2 |
| 1540 | -1.0 |
| 1940 | -1.6 |
| 2440 | -2.3 |
| 3070 | -0.1 |
| 3870 | 3.8 |
| 4870 | 4.7 |
| 6130 | 1.3 |
| 7720 | 3.1 |
| 9720 | 5.0 |
| 12200 | -3.2 |
| 15400 | 1.4 |
| 19400 | 5.9 |
Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores (1–5), modeled from the measured response. Higher is better across timbre, distortion, and immersiveness — add other models to see where this one lands.
The verdict
The Shokz OpenFit 2 brings meaningful improvements over its predecessor with better comfort, superior controls, and marathon-worthy battery life. While they still can't match the audio quality of sealed earbuds, they're an excellent choice for athletes and outdoor enthusiasts.
✓Liked: Comfortable, Physical controls, Long battery, Customizable EQ with presets
✕Could be better: No wear detection, Sound leakage, Non-waterproof case, No Find My feature
Nobody who owns the SHOKZ OpenFit 2 has written in yet.
Owner notes are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not edited by us. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from notes.
Own the SHOKZ OpenFit 2?
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying. Shown under a pseudonym.
Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.





1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Battery in real life — better than expected




0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Noise cancelling in the real world — worse than expected



