@tonyinpublic · Owner-reported
Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
The case scratches really easily, other than that these earbuds are probably the best bang for your buck possible.
- Battery · better than expected
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.


@tonyinpublic · Owner-reported
Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
The case scratches really easily, other than that these earbuds are probably the best bang for your buck possible.
Own it? Your review joins these
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying · Sign-in needed to publish · Photo optional
ANC, battery, and bass, what else do you need?
At 8.4, its noise cancelling beats 84% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 87 of the 256 we've cataloged.
A 4.9 puts its audio quality in the top quarter of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 64 of the 256 we've cataloged.
Would buy it again and still uses it daily.
Owned over 2 years.
above average for wireless earbuds — based on 238 of 256 we've cataloged.
IPX4 is the most common — on 37% of the 237 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 256).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 11.2 |
| 25 | 11.2 |
| 32 | 10.9 |
| 40 | 10.8 |
| 50 | 10.7 |
| 63 | 10.5 |
| 80 | 9.5 |
| 100 | 7.4 |
| 125 | 4.9 |
| 160 | 2.0 |
| 200 | 0.6 |
| 250 | -0.3 |
| 315 | -0.9 |
| 400 | -1.7 |
| 500 | -2.6 |
| 630 | -1.1 |
| 800 | -0.1 |
| 1000 | 0.0 |
| 1250 | 0.5 |
| 1600 | 2.7 |
| 2000 | 4.8 |
| 2500 | 7.3 |
| 3150 | 8.0 |
| 4000 | 6.8 |
| 5000 | 8.6 |
| 6300 | 9.7 |
| 8000 | 9.9 |
| 10000 | -0.1 |
| 12500 | 1.7 |
| 16000 | -2.9 |
| 20000 | -30.7 |
Passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 1.8 |
| 26 | 1.7 |
| 33 | 2.2 |
| 41 | 2.6 |
| 52 | 2.8 |
| 65 | 3.4 |
| 82 | 4.2 |
| 103 | 4.2 |
| 130 | 4.7 |
| 163 | 4.0 |
| 205 | 6.2 |
| 259 | 7.3 |
| 325 | 7.2 |
| 410 | 7.7 |
| 516 | 5.3 |
| 613 | 8.0 |
| 772 | 14.3 |
| 972 | 15.1 |
| 1220 | 14.9 |
| 1540 | 14.9 |
| 1940 | 19.6 |
| 2440 | 25.1 |
| 3070 | 25.5 |
| 3870 | 21.7 |
| 4870 | 18.2 |
| 6130 | 21.6 |
| 7720 | 31.1 |
| 9720 | 31.7 |
| 12200 | 34.5 |
| 15400 | 33.8 |
| 19400 | 37.1 |
Total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 0.1 |
| 26 | 14.3 |
| 33 | 26.3 |
| 41 | 33.8 |
| 52 | 30.1 |
| 65 | 30.8 |
| 82 | 29.8 |
| 103 | 29.6 |
| 130 | 28.1 |
| 163 | 26.2 |
| 205 | 31.1 |
| 259 | 24.9 |
| 325 | 18.2 |
| 410 | 17.8 |
| 516 | 15.3 |
| 613 | 14.5 |
| 772 | 24.8 |
| 972 | 22.3 |
| 1220 | 19.5 |
| 1540 | 17.3 |
| 1940 | 26.7 |
| 2440 | 31.7 |
| 3070 | 25.3 |
| 3870 | 24.0 |
| 4870 | 20.4 |
| 6130 | 30.7 |
| 7720 | 30.2 |
| 9720 | 31.5 |
| 12200 | 33.3 |
| 15400 | 28.2 |
| 19400 | 38.3 |
Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores (1–5), modeled from the measured response. Higher is better across timbre, distortion, and immersiveness — add other models to see where this one lands.
The verdict
These are definitely a contender for some of the best affordable noise canceling earbuds based on performance and value. With an IPX4 rating, long battery life, and good ANC, these are worth a go. You might not want to go for a run with them, but otherwise they're decent.
✓Liked: Price, ANC, Battery life, LDAC, AAC, SBC codecs
✕Could be better: Chunky case, Many EQ presets are too bassy
What a reader who owns the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC reports after living with it. Owner-reported, checked before publishing; ordered photo-verified first, then newest.
Owner reviews are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not rewritten by us: at most we proofread typos, which is shown on the review’s own page and which the author can undo. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from owner reviews.
1 owner review
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againThe case scratches really easily, other than that these earbuds are probably the best bang for your buck possible.
Sign-in needed to publish.
What readers ask about the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC, answered by the people who own it.
Nobody has asked the owners yet.
Ask the first question →See how the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC stacks up against the competition.
Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.



1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
The battery beat their expectations




0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from the noise cancelling






2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners · owners report ~7 h per charge vs 6 h claimed
The fit and build beat their expectations
The fit and build beat their expectations