Every editorial hub, scoped to earbuds.
Every editorial hub, scoped to headphones.
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
@maroon_lagoon_39 · Owner-reported
Owned 6–12 months · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
I was surprised how punchy the sound is. I own Sony's WH-1000XM3 and these little buds, once tuned slightly with the very good companion app, get close to matching the Sony's, no small feat!
@curious_viola_72 · Owner-reported
Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Rock solid, beautiful and unique looking buds.
Own it? Your review joins these
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying · Sign-in needed to publish · Photo optional
At 7.1, its noise cancelling beats 24% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 91 of the 252 we've cataloged.
A 4.9 puts its audio quality in the top quarter of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 64 of the 252 we've cataloged.
2 of 2 would buy again. 2 of 2 still use it daily.
Owned 6–12 months to over 2 years.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 236 of 252 we've cataloged.
above average for wireless earbuds — based on 235 of 252 we've cataloged.
IPX4 is the most common — on 36% of the 232 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 252).
Active is the most common — on 61% of the 172 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 252).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Nothing Ear (1st Gen) Frequency Response (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 4.8 |
| 25 | 5.8 |
| 32 | 6.7 |
| 40 | 7.8 |
| 50 | 8.8 |
| 63 | 8.6 |
| 80 | 6.9 |
| 100 | 4.6 |
| 125 | 2.5 |
| 160 | 0.7 |
| 200 | -0.2 |
| 250 | -0.4 |
| 315 | -0.8 |
| 400 | -4.5 |
| 500 | -6.1 |
| 630 | -2.9 |
| 800 | -2.4 |
| 1000 | -2.0 |
| 1250 | -0.0 |
| 1600 | 3.1 |
| 2000 | 5.2 |
| 2500 | 6.7 |
| 3150 | 6.5 |
| 4000 | 6.5 |
| 5000 | 7.8 |
| 6300 | 6.0 |
| 8000 | 4.0 |
| 10000 | -2.6 |
| 12500 | 0.5 |
| 16000 | -8.4 |
| 20000 | -31.1 |
Nothing Ear (1st Gen) Attenuation (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Solid lines: passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Dashed lines: total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 1.1 |
| 26 | -0.7 |
| 33 | 0.5 |
| 41 | 0.8 |
| 52 | 0.6 |
| 65 | 0.9 |
| 82 | 1.1 |
| 103 | 1.6 |
| 130 | 1.9 |
| 163 | 2.4 |
| 205 | 2.2 |
| 259 | 3.3 |
| 325 | 4.3 |
| 410 | 5.2 |
| 516 | 2.4 |
| 613 | 4.3 |
| 772 | 8.7 |
| 972 | 9.6 |
| 1220 | 10.9 |
| 1540 | 12.2 |
| 1940 | 16.0 |
| 2440 | 21.4 |
| 3070 | 25.4 |
| 3870 | 25.7 |
| 4870 | 25.8 |
| 6130 | 24.0 |
| 7720 | 30.3 |
| 9720 | 29.8 |
| 12200 | 18.9 |
| 15400 | 19.6 |
| 19400 | 35.2 |
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 1.5 |
| 26 | 5.6 |
| 33 | 7.4 |
| 41 | 7.8 |
| 52 | 8.0 |
| 65 | 13.3 |
| 82 | 18.5 |
| 103 | 21.9 |
| 130 | 21.1 |
| 163 | 20.7 |
| 205 | 18.9 |
| 259 | 17.4 |
| 325 | 11.5 |
| 410 | 9.6 |
| 516 | 6.3 |
| 613 | 7.9 |
| 772 | 15.6 |
| 972 | 17.2 |
| 1220 | 17.2 |
| 1540 | 18.7 |
| 1940 | 25.3 |
| 2440 | 30.1 |
| 3070 | 29.6 |
| 3870 | 27.2 |
| 4870 | 26.5 |
| 6130 | 22.4 |
| 7720 | 25.8 |
| 9720 | 25.8 |
| 12200 | 15.2 |
| 15400 | 13.8 |
| 19400 | 30.0 |
Nothing Ear (1st Gen) MDAQS
Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores, Scale 1 - 5
Virtual mean opinion scores (MOS) on a 1–5 scale, modeled from the measured response by HEAD acoustics’ MDAQS (Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Score) model. Higher is better across timbre, distortion, and immersiveness — add other models to see where this one lands.
The verdict
Anyone looking for wireless earbuds should consider the Nothing Ear. These earbuds are packed full of features that will please casual listeners and audiophiles alike.
✓Liked: Comfortable, Great sound, Awesome companion app, LDAC and LHDC support
✕Could be better: Mediocre noise canceling, ANC changes sound quality
What readers who own the Nothing Ear (1st Gen) report after living with it. Owner-reported, checked before publishing; ordered photo-verified first, then newest.
Owner reviews are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not rewritten by us: at most we proofread typos, which is shown on the review’s own page and which the author can undo. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from owner reviews.
2 owner reviews
MLEvery author writes under a generated pseudonym; a member can choose to show their name and photo beside it. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 6–12 months · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againI was surprised how punchy the sound is. I own Sony's WH-1000XM3 and these little buds, once tuned slightly with the very good companion app, get close to matching the Sony's, no small feat!
CVEvery author writes under a generated pseudonym; a member can choose to show their name and photo beside it. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned over 2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againRock solid, beautiful and unique looking buds.
Sign-in needed to publish.
What readers ask about the Nothing Ear (1st Gen), answered by the people who own it.
Nobody has asked the owners yet.
Ask the first question →Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.
Dave CarrVideo Producer/WriterPersonal Sound is my favorite feature on the Nothing Headphone (1)Tailor your listening with this easy-to-miss Nothing Headphone (1) feature.
Tom TriggsContributorPhone-specific features suck. Here's whyHeadphone manufacturers are marching to the same somber beat.Tom TriggsContributorThe best Nothing Headphone (1) alternativesIs the hype for nothing?Tom TriggsContributorI uncovered a major issue with the Nothing Headphone (1)Nothing's worse than headphones that don't fit.Tom TriggsContributorWhat do all the Nothing Headphone (1)'s EQ presets sound like?Let's explore what's in store for you.
Christian ThomasEditor-at-largeHow long should your earbuds last? Our battery tests have the answerEarbuds don't last long, but how much is enough?Christian ThomasEditor-at-large
1 of 2 would buy again
2 owners
The battery beat their expectations
Comfort beat their expectations
1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from comfort
2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners · owners report ~10 h per charge vs 8.73 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
The battery beat their expectations
0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations
0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from the noise cancelling
2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners
The battery beat their expectations
The battery beat their expectations
1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · owners report ~7 h per charge vs 10 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
