All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
Best On-Ear Headphones
From all the pairs we’ve tested, these are the on-ear headphones that truly stood out.
September 26, 2025
Adam is an Editor at SoundGuys specializing in gaming headsets, flagship headphones, and earbuds. A lifelong fan of video games and cinema, he brings a sharp ear and passion for immersive sound to every review. Beyond hardware, Adam writes thought-provoking features and opinion pieces that explore how audio tech shapes our lives. Armed with a BA in Cognitive Science, he pairs technical insight with a love for music’s psychological uplift. At home, he still rocks his original Sennheiser MOMENTUM over-ears, switches to Bose QuietComfort Ultra on flights, and relies on Galaxy Buds2 Pro while out and about.
With so many headphone styles out there, choosing the right pair can feel overwhelming. Earbuds are great for portability, while over-ear models excel at comfort and immersion. But if you’re looking for a Goldilocks middle ground, on-ear headphones strike the perfect balance — lighter than over-ears yet more powerful than earbuds. And while some high-end models can get pricey, you don’t have to break the bank. After extensive testing, we’ve rounded up the best on-ear headphones available right now.
Compare table
Filter
- Compare tableProductVotes
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$130
8.1
6.1
7.3
7.5
8.4
7.0
7.5
8.5
9.9
9.0
8.3
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$79
6.8
4.7
7.0
5.0
8.5
6.0
5.0
7.0
9.8
7.0
7.0
- 2 total votes2 total votes
$129
6.8
3.0
0.0
6.9
6.2
7.0
7.5
7.7
9.8
7.0
7.5
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$199
6.8
6.6
0.0
6.6
4.2
5.0
9.0
7.0
10.0
7.6
8.2
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$150
6.7
0.0
0.0
6.5
6.0
8.0
7.5
7.0
9.9
8.0
7.5
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$59
6.5
3.0
0.0
6.9
7.7
6.3
5.0
7.4
9.9
6.0
7.4
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$38
6.4
3.7
0.0
6.0
7.5
5.5
5.0
7.0
9.9
8.0
7.2
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$99
6.4
3.0
0.0
6.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
7.0
10.0
8.0
7.0
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$89
6.4
5.5
0.0
7.3
7.5
7.0
5.0
7.7
9.2
7.0
3.8
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$49
6.3
1.8
0.0
8.6
8.4
8.3
7.5
8.1
8.2
0.0
7.0
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$0
6.2
0.0
0.0
7.8
7.5
7.8
7.5
8.2
8.6
0.0
8.2
- 0 total votes0 total votes
$86
5.9
0.0
0.0
7.6
7.7
8.1
4.0
8.7
8.5
0.0
8.8
Product chart
In the chart above, you can see how each of the headphones compares in terms of price and performance.
To gather information about how well each of the earbuds and headphones work, we subject each product to a number of objective tests. We use a Bruel & Kjaer 5128 acoustic measurement system to test headphones and earbuds in our SoundGuys lab. The ear canal of the artificial head was created by averaging and smoothing 3D models of individual ear canal features from the MRI scans of 40 different people.
We perform the following testing to determine the best headphones and best earbuds:
- We run sequences to determine the best fit of the headphones, and if there are any manufacturing issues with the product.
- We measure the headphones’ performance and compare the frequency response to our industry-validated SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve to give context to readers.
- To rate sound quality, we use the Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores (MDAQS) algorithm from HEAD acoustics. These are virtual mean opinion scores as calculated by a powerful machine learning model based on the input of real listeners.
- We play several samples of shaped noise over loudspeakers to test noise canceling and record with our artificial head. We take samples with ANC on, ANC off, and with the headphones off the head. After subtracting the appropriate curves from each other, we can see how well the headphones block out noise.
- To evaluate microphone quality, we play pre-recorded spoken Harvard sentences from a calibrated artificial mouth in our test chamber, either with or without simulated background noises, simulated reverberant spaces, or artificial wind.
- To measure battery life, we play back music through the headphones or earbuds peaking at 75dB(SPL), a safe and realistic listening level.
In addition to objective testing, our team of audio experts uses each of the headphones and earbuds to evaluate the experience of using the product. By wearing the headphones in day-to-day use, we evaluate the comfort, noting any pain points. We also make sure to try out each of the features that the headphones have to offer, such as using the equalizer in the companion app.
Using a combination of subjective and objective testing, we score each product. To learn more about how we evaluate headphones and earbuds, check out our in-depth explainer on how we test.
Here at SoundGuys, we’ve been testing audio products for over a decade. Our team comprises audio product experts who have tested hundreds of different headphones, earbuds, and speakers. Moreover, our team comes from diverse backgrounds and a wealth of expertise, including audio engineering, film production, journalism, podcasting, music production, and even touring musicians.
Everything we recommend results from our objective measurements and great subjective experiences. Ultimately, we want you to enjoy your purchase or, at the very least, leave our site with a little more knowledge about the inner workings of audio. To see why you can trust us with your purchase decision, make sure to check out our ethics policy.
Poll
How much are you willing to spend on good headphones?
Best overall pick: JBL Live 670NC
We favor the JBL Live 670NC as our best overall on-ear pick for commuters and casual listeners thanks to a broad, well-supported feature set. They combine JBL’s “True-adaptive Noise Canceling” with adjustable Ambient Aware and TalkThru modes, and in our standardized battery testing they ran for 54 hours and 57 minutes with ANC engaged. Our MDAQS reporting also reflects strong sound performance for most listeners, and the companion app gives a usable 10-band EQ and spatial options. The Live 670NC support Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint, and a wired 3.5mm option for flights or older gear. They also earned Best ANC, Best Sound Quality, Best for Comfort, and Bluetooth 5.0 and more recognition in the article, all of which are reflected in the features and measurements above.
Best ANC pick: JBL Tune 660NC
The JBL Tune 660NC stand out for delivering very capable active noise canceling in an on-ear package, with roughly a 10dB reduction in low-mid frequencies that noticeably quiets engine and commute noise. They pair Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity and multipoint support with an included 3.5mm cable for wired listening, and our testing returned a long battery life (37 hours and 9 minutes with ANC on). Physical onboard controls are straightforward, and the headset’s SBC/AAC codec support keeps pairing simple across devices. The Tune 660NC also earned recognition for Best Value and Best Call Quality, which aligns with their strong ANC, respectable battery life, and reliable microphone performance in varied environments. If ANC is your priority in a compact on-ear design, these are a compelling option.
Best for iPhone users pick: Beats Solo3 Wireless
The Beats Solo3 Wireless are our choice for iPhone users because Apple’s W1 chip makes pairing and multi-device recognition seamless, and AAC support ensures dependable high-quality streaming on iOS devices. They delivered exceptional runtime in our testing (45 hours and 8 minutes) and Fast Fuel charging that gives roughly three hours of playback after a five-minute top-up. Sonically, the Solo3 skews bass-forward and achieved a solid MDAQS of 4.7, which many listeners will prefer for pop and hip-hop. The Solo3’s low-profile on-ear design and broad color options also make them a fashion-forward, easy-to-stow option for daily use. They additionally carry a Best Sound Quality badge alongside their Best for iPhone users recognition.
Best Battery Life pick: Beats Solo 4
The Beats Solo 4 shine for sheer longevity, surviving our battery test for 84 hours and 18 minutes at a reasonable listening level, and they offer both USB-C and 3.5mm wired listening when you do run out of power. The foldable on-ear design and included carrying case make them convenient for commutes, though the on-ear fit concentrates pressure on the outer ear and led to discomfort after extended sessions in our use. They do not include active noise canceling, so isolation is limited compared with ANC-equipped models. The Solo 4 also carries a Best for Comfort badge in the article, but our measurements and time-on-head observations show comfort can be hit-or-miss depending on the listener’s tolerance for on-ear pressure.
Best for Android users pick: Marshall Major V
The Marshall Major V are our pick for Android users thanks to Bluetooth 5.3 support with SBC, AAC and LC3 codecs, multipoint connectivity, and a customizable companion app with a 5-band EQ and programmable M-button. In lab testing they reached 92 hours and 52 minutes of playback, and the headphones add wireless charging and a foldable, compact on-ear form factor. The Major V emphasize customization and convenient sharing via a dual-function 3.5mm port, making them flexible for Android setups. Their vintage Marshall styling and robust app controls justify the article’s Best for Android users recognition.
Our verdict
Across these on-ear options we leaned on measured battery life, ANC performance, and platform-specific integration to guide our picks: the JBL Live 670NC balances strong adaptive ANC, app tuning, and a long ~55-hour battery to earn our best overall nod; the Tune 660NC is a tighter, value-oriented ANC pick; Beats’ Solo3 and Solo 4 split roles between iPhone-friendly ease and class-leading battery life respectively; and the Marshall Major V targets Android users who want codec flexibility and deep EQ control.
If you prioritize noise canceling on an on-ear set, the JBL Live 670NC and JBL Tune 660NC are the most directly focused on ANC performance; if battery life is your single most important metric, the Beats Solo 4 and Marshall Major V lead the pack.
The two remaining models we reviewed, the Sony WH-CH510 and WH-CH520, are simpler, more budget-focused options: the WH-CH510 has very long battery life (about 46 hours) but an unpredictable sidetone implementation and a basic build, while the WH-CH520 offers comfortable fit, Fast Pair and multipoint support and about 55 hours of runtime but no ANC, making them best for listeners who want reliable, no-frills on-ear headphones rather than advanced noise-canceling or audiophile features.
FAQ
Consumers and manufacturers alike have realized that isolation is a greater challenge with on-ear headphones, and they sometimes clamp too tightly. Even so, you can’t deny that on-ears are portable compared to over-ear headphones.
On-ear headphones offer a balanced compromise between sound quality and portability. While they don’t provide the same level of immersion as over-ear models, they deliver respectable audio performances suitable for most music genres.
Comfort is subjective and depends on individual preference. Over-ear headphones usually provide a more comfortable fit for extended periods, thanks to their cushioned ear cups that enclose the ears. On-ear models can be lighter but may apply pressure directly to the ears, which some people find uncomfortable over time.
Unlike over-ears, on-ear headphones sit directly on top of your ears. They do not often create a seal to your head as well as over-ears can. That looser fit can make them feel lighter and more breathable, which some people find more comfortable for short or casual listening sessions. However, it also means they usually block out less outside noise and may leak sound more easily, especially at higher volumes.
The on-ear design is great for listeners who want many of the benefits of over-ear headphones, without all the added heft. These aren’t quite pocketable as in-ears, but they often include rotating or collapsible hinges for storage. Again, manufacturers can include large batteries into these headphones.
Isolation, the ability for a headset to block out background noise, is difficult with on-ear headphones. An innocent wiggle of the ear could set the whole fit off-kilter, and let in all of the environmental noise around you. This is bad, because good isolation yields optimal audio quality.
Sometimes on-ear headphones can provide very effective isolation at the expense of comfort. This is true for the Beats Solo Pro noise-canceling on-ear headphones, which feel like wearing a vice grip. Another disadvantage: even though they’re easier to carry than over-ear headphones, they’re still cumbersome relative to earbuds.
Not usually. On-ear headphones can slip during intense movement and don’t manage sweat as effectively as earbuds. For workouts, wireless earbuds or bone-conduction headphones are generally better choices.
Not as much as over-ear headphones. Some models include active noise cancelling (ANC), which electronically reduces outside noise, but passive isolation (physical blocking) is usually limited.
Yes, generally more than over-ear or in-ear headphones. Because they don’t create a full seal around your ear, people nearby may hear your music, especially at higher volumes. Closed-back designs leak less than open-back ones.
Not yet. While Bluetooth has become way better and more convenient in the last few years, it still can’t compete on a technical level with wired over-ear headphones. Sure, we might be a little biased against removing the headphone jack. Still, even our objective testing of the LDAC codec (which is arguably one of the top transfer methods currently available) revealed that Bluetooth falls short. Of course, you probably won’t have to worry about it too much if you’re over the age of 24 because our hearing tends to go a lot sooner than you might realize, but it’s still something you should be aware of. At least for now, wired headphones still reign supreme.
Over-ear headphones generally offer superior sound quality due to their larger drivers and better isolation, which minimizes ambient noise and allows for a more immersive listening experience.
Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.