@patient_badger_81 · Owner-reported
Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
very good ANC, the only thing is that they broke after a 1,5 year
- Noise cancelling in the real world · better than expected
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
1 / 11@patient_badger_81 · Owner-reported
Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
very good ANC, the only thing is that they broke after a 1,5 year
Own it? Your note joins these
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying · About 2 minutes · No account needed · Photo optional
Halo products often disappoint on value.
At 8.5, its noise cancelling beats 90% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 91 of the 260 we've cataloged.
Would buy it again and still uses it daily.
Owned 1–2 years.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 243 of 260 we've cataloged.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 241 of 260 we've cataloged.
IPX4 is the most common — on 36% of the 239 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 260).
Active is the most common — on 60% of the 178 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 260).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 19.6 |
| 25 | 22.4 |
| 32 | 23.2 |
| 40 | 22.0 |
| 50 | 20.0 |
| 63 | 17.7 |
| 80 | 15.0 |
| 100 | 11.7 |
| 125 | 8.1 |
| 160 | 5.3 |
| 200 | 3.7 |
| 250 | 1.3 |
| 315 | 1.5 |
| 400 | 1.8 |
| 500 | 0.6 |
| 630 | -0.2 |
| 800 | 0.1 |
| 1000 | 0.1 |
| 1250 | 1.6 |
| 1600 | 7.2 |
| 2000 | 14.0 |
| 2500 | 17.9 |
| 3150 | 15.4 |
| 4000 | 14.3 |
| 5000 | 9.8 |
| 6300 | 10.2 |
| 8000 | 11.1 |
| 10000 | 4.7 |
| 12500 | 0.8 |
| 16000 | -4.2 |
| 20000 | -50.0 |
Passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 0.8 |
| 26 | 0.6 |
| 33 | 0.0 |
| 41 | 0.0 |
| 52 | -0.1 |
| 65 | -0.1 |
| 82 | -0.2 |
| 103 | -0.5 |
| 130 | -1.9 |
| 163 | -0.8 |
| 205 | -1.2 |
| 259 | -2.0 |
| 325 | -2.8 |
| 410 | -2.4 |
| 516 | 1.4 |
| 613 | -0.6 |
| 772 | 5.0 |
| 972 | 7.1 |
| 1220 | 9.3 |
| 1540 | 11.9 |
| 1940 | 15.5 |
| 2440 | 22.1 |
| 3070 | 24.8 |
| 3870 | 29.1 |
| 4870 | 34.3 |
| 6130 | 33.3 |
| 7720 | 25.3 |
| 9720 | 33.9 |
| 12200 | 15.2 |
| 15400 | 26.2 |
| 19400 | 25.3 |
Total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 0.5 |
| 26 | 0.3 |
| 33 | -0.9 |
| 41 | -2.5 |
| 52 | -6.2 |
| 65 | -1.3 |
| 82 | 6.9 |
| 103 | 8.0 |
| 130 | 9.2 |
| 163 | 12.8 |
| 205 | 12.4 |
| 259 | 12.5 |
| 325 | 12.8 |
| 410 | 11.8 |
| 516 | 12.7 |
| 613 | 10.7 |
| 772 | 11.8 |
| 972 | 13.2 |
| 1220 | 12.4 |
| 1540 | 12.2 |
| 1940 | 15.8 |
| 2440 | 25.0 |
| 3070 | 27.7 |
| 3870 | 28.9 |
| 4870 | 31.4 |
| 6130 | 27.0 |
| 7720 | 20.0 |
| 9720 | 30.4 |
| 12200 | 12.7 |
| 15400 | 10.8 |
| 19400 | 15.9 |
The verdict
Bose may have long held the title of "king of ANC," but that title is complicated by the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds II. It has great active noise canceling (ANC) and some fascinating features, but weird sound choices, and a sky-high price make for a poor value.
✓Liked: Light weight, App-supported updates, Auto-EQ feature
✕Could be better: Difficult fit, Questionable frequency response, Price, No way to disable ANC
What a reader who owns the Bose QuietComfort II reports after living with it. Owner-reported, checked before publishing; ordered photo-verified first, then newest.
Owner notes are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not edited by us. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from notes.
1 owner note
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · The reader says they own it. We have not seen proof, and we say so — no label here is proof of a purchase. Read more · Owned 1–2 years · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would buy againvery good ANC, the only thing is that they broke after a 1,5 year
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.





1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Battery in real life — better than expected




0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Noise cancelling in the real world — worse than expected


1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Battery in real life — better than expected

