Just a few after the Jaybird X4 earbuds were released, we got a chance to look at the Jaybird Tarah. They were another pair of exercise ‘buds that had similar specs but were also $30 cheaper than the Jaybird X4’s. Are they still a good deal? Or should you just go with the good ‘ol Jaybird X4’s instead?
Who are they for?
- Gym rats. Jaybird is known for fitness headphones, and was leading the pack for years. The Jaybird Tarah earbuds are no exception to that legacy, even if they don’t have top of the line specs.
- Anyone who doesn’t like true wireless earbuds. If you’re not a fan of true wireless earbuds while you exercise, then the Tarah’s are for you thanks to their classic Bluetooth earbud design.
- People not looking to break the bank. Whether you’re looking to gift these to someone or just don’t like to spend a ton of money on a pair of headphones you’re going to sweat into, these are now just $50 which is a perfect sweet spot for most people.
Editor’s note: This post was updated on December 27th, 2019 to include links to helpful information.
How do the two compare in terms of build quality?
It doesn’t make sense to talk about the new Jaybird Tarah ‘buds in a bubble. We can’t avoid comparing them to the X4, especially since the releases were so close to each other. So what are the differences? Well first, there’s the general look and feel of the headphones. Where the X4 seems more sleek and modern, the Tarah comes across almost whimsical. Even the charging cradle that comes with the Tarah looks more fun compared to the utilitarian design of the one that came with the Jaybird X4. Granted, it’s still a charging cradle which is annoying, but I still think it’s a step in the right direction.
The control module is also slightly bigger and has a slightly more square shape to it, but I actually like it more than the X4 because it gives the buttons more real estate making them easier to find and press when you’re wearing them. Not that it was hard on the X4, but it’s definitely easier on the Tarah. The only other difference physically I can find is the shape of the earbud housings and the ear tip nozzles. The Tarah even has what was arguably the standout feature in the Jaybird X4 which was the IPX7 water-resistance rating.
It might be easier to discuss the Tarah in terms of what it doesn’t have. When you open the box, you won’t be greeted with the nifty carrying case that comes with the X4. Or with the memory foam earbuds or any of the other ear tips. Where the Jaybird X4 allows you to mix and match ear tips and ear wings, the Tarah comes with just three hybrid tips (s, m, l). I didn’t have any issues with the fit of these, but it does mean that those with picky ears will have fewer options to play around with to find the perfect match.
What about connection strength?
As far as I can tell, these are just as good as the X4. In the few days I’ve had them I only had one weird issue with playback that resolved itself as soon as I restarted the headphones, so I’m chalking it up to a random glitch. Besides that, the connection is just another aspect that both Jaybird products have in common.
The playback controls also work perfectly and share the same controls as the X4 as well. The plus and minus buttons obviously control volume, but also let you skip between tracks if you hold them down. The middle down acts as a multifunction button for pausing/playing music, answering or ending phone calls, and activating Siri or the Google Assistant. Then there’s the app which is the same across all Jaybird devices. You can customize EQ settings and even find your headphones if you misplace them somewhere.
Which pair of Jaybirds have better battery life?
This is probably the biggest difference between the Tarah and the Jaybird X4 ‘buds. Where the X4 promised around eight hours of constant playback, you’ll only get six with the Tarah. It’s not big of a deal in everyday use as I’m sure most people aren’t working out for more than six hours at a time, but you feel notice this difference over the course of a few days. Though it’s worth mentioning that both pairs offer quick charging features, so a few minutes on the charger will get you through a last-minute workout.
Headed to the gym? How long do you typically listen to music while exercising?
— Sound Guys (@realsoundguys) September 11, 2018
If your workouts tend to last an hour (which this poll we ran on Twitter confirms), then you’ll be recharging these two or three times throughout the week compared to just once or twice for the X4. Again, it isn’t a huge deal but it’s one worth mentioning. Especially since it’s the biggest difference between the two headphones.
What’s different about the songs these Jaybird ‘buds sing?
When it comes to sound quality, this is just one more aspect of the two headphones that’s more or less the same. As far as I can tell, there’s no real difference in sound quality between the two, and even if there was you can still use the Jaybird app to EQ them to your preference just like the X4. It could be because of the lack of memory foam tips, but the low end does seem a little less strong here. That said, it isn’t so different from the X4 that you can’t change it just by picking a different preset.
This is most noticeable in the song Submission by Gorillaz, where the thumping bass sounded lower than it did on the X4’s. If the X4’s were given a slight emphasis in the lows then the Tarah’s were given a little extra in the mids. Bass kicks don’t get in the way of vocals as much in the Tarah’s as they do in the X4’s, but the Tarah’s are also a little less clear so pick your poison.
You can hear this in Generator Second^ Floor by Freelance Whales where it’s hard to differentiate between vocals and instruments at times. Again, this is me just being nitpicky because for all intents and purposes, you’ll get more or less the same experience regardless of which pair you get. The only difference worth noting was that I noticed the Tarah’s sounded louder than the X4’s. Not because they have a greater output, but because the nozzles are angled differently, and seem to shoot sound more directly down my ear-canal.
Should you get the Jaybird Tarah earbuds?
Jaybird seems to know that their target audience is people who exercise, and those people tend to not want to spend upwards of $100 on a pair of earbuds for the gym. In the X4 review I stated that they were the pair to get because of the added IPX7 rating, but not even a month later that’s changed because now there really isn’t a reason to get those over the Tarah’s. The Tarah earbuds offer the same IPX7 rating, the same controls, and more or less the same sound quality.
The biggest difference is the battery life which is six hours instead of eight, but I’d say that’s a worthy trade to save around $20. If you don’t mind spending the extra cash then maybe the Jaybird X4 is the one for you, but the Tarah’s still had the same appeal as they did when they first came out. Similar specs, build, and design for less money. Now that the Tarah’s are under $50, they’re just an even better deal.
But what about the true wireless options?
Since the release of the X4 and Tarah earbuds, Jaybird has also released a pair of true wireless earbuds in the Jaybird Vista. They’re rocking an IPX7 build as well, a strong connection, auto-connect, decent battery life at around 5.5 hours, and even USB-C charging so no more charging cradles. That said, they’re not without their issues either. They aren’t the most comfortable pair of ‘buds and they’re also not cheap. If you want to experience a true wireless pair of ‘buds from Jaybird, be prepared to spend even more than you would on the original AirPods. If you still don’t like anything you’d like to bring to the gym with you, then you can always check out some of the other pairs that, like the Tarah’s, made our best workout earbuds list.
Disclosure: We may receive affiliate compensation in connection with your purchase of products via links on this page. Even though we may receive compensation, we always give our honest opinions, findings, beliefs, or experiences on each product. See our ethics policy for more details.