

Sony WH-1000XM5
2 of 4 would buy again
4 owners · owners report ~40 h per charge vs 40 h claimed
Expected more from the fit and build
The battery beat their expectations
The noise cancelling beat their expectations
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
1 / 6A new model sits atop the HD 600 line.
A 0.7 puts its noise isolation in the bottom 10% of over-ear headphones we've measured.
Measured on 92 of the 239 we've cataloged.
No one has reported on this one yet.
Be the first. We ask a few quick questions about living with it, then check the review before publishing.
Own the Sennheiser HD 660S2?
Be the first owner to write in — three answers, four quick reads, shown under a pseudonym. Sign-in needed to publish.
Wired-3.5mm is the most common — on 46% of the 248 over-ear headphones we've cataloged (of 239).
below average for over-ear headphones — based on 198 of 239 we've cataloged.
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Sennheiser HD 660S2 Frequency Response (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | -8.5 |
| 25 | -6.4 |
| 32 | -4.7 |
| 40 | -3.2 |
| 50 | -2.3 |
| 63 | -1.8 |
| 80 | -1.5 |
| 100 | -0.7 |
| 125 | -0.4 |
| 160 | -0.5 |
| 200 | -0.6 |
| 250 | -0.5 |
| 315 | -0.7 |
| 400 | -0.8 |
| 500 | -0.8 |
| 630 | -0.5 |
| 800 | 0.0 |
| 1000 | 0.5 |
| 1250 | 1.6 |
| 1600 | 2.3 |
| 2000 | 3.0 |
| 2500 | 5.0 |
| 3150 | 7.2 |
| 4000 | 4.8 |
| 5000 | 3.2 |
| 6300 | 6.9 |
| 8000 | 6.7 |
| 10000 | 3.9 |
| 12500 | -0.3 |
| 16000 | -4.7 |
| 20000 | -18.9 |
Sennheiser HD 660S2 Attenuation (measured on a B&K 5128)
Click a line or a legend entry to highlight it. Click again to clear.Tap a legend entry to highlight its line. Tap again to clear.
Solid lines: passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 0.4 |
| 26 | 0.3 |
| 33 | 0.1 |
| 41 | -0.1 |
| 52 | -0.0 |
| 65 | -0.1 |
| 82 | -0.2 |
| 103 | 0.1 |
| 130 | 0.0 |
| 163 | 0.1 |
| 205 | -0.1 |
| 259 | -0.0 |
| 325 | -0.1 |
| 410 | -0.3 |
| 516 | -0.1 |
| 613 | -0.2 |
| 772 | -0.7 |
| 972 | -1.2 |
| 1220 | -1.2 |
| 1540 | 0.1 |
| 1940 | 3.3 |
| 2440 | 8.6 |
| 3070 | 7.2 |
| 3870 | 8.7 |
| 4870 | 11.5 |
| 6130 | 17.8 |
| 7720 | 16.7 |
| 9720 | 15.3 |
| 12200 | 2.3 |
| 15400 | 10.4 |
| 19400 | 11.1 |
The verdict
The Sennheiser HD 660S2 is slightly bassier than its predecessor, but this isn't for bass-heads, and also not for those who need significant treble emphasis. It's not a good or bad thing, it's just a preference issue—but this fact should inform your buying decisions.
✓Liked: Good sound, Easy maintenance, Comfort, Connectivity
✕Could be better: Sound not for everyone, Price
Nobody who owns the Sennheiser HD 660S2 has written in yet.
Owner reviews are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not rewritten by us: at most we proofread typos, which is shown on the review’s own page and which the author can undo. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from owner reviews.
Own the Sennheiser HD 660S2?
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying. Shown under a pseudonym. Sign-in needed to publish.
What readers ask about the Sennheiser HD 660S2, answered by the people who own it.
Nobody has asked the owners yet.
Ask the first question →Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.


2 of 4 would buy again
4 owners · owners report ~40 h per charge vs 40 h claimed
Expected more from the fit and build
The battery beat their expectations
The noise cancelling beat their expectations


1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Nothing surprising about comfort


0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
The noise cancelling beat their expectations



0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · 1 photo-verified
Expected more from comfort


0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations


1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · owners report ~55 h per charge vs 53.77 h claimed
The battery beat their expectations