@swift_juniper_80 · Photo-verified
Owned 1–6 months · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Didn't research much, but the earcups being very shallow was something i regret
- Comfort · worse than expected
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.


@swift_juniper_80 · Photo-verified
Owned 1–6 months · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Didn't research much, but the earcups being very shallow was something i regret
Own it? Your note joins these
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying · About 2 minutes · No account needed · Photo optional
At 8.7, its noise cancelling beats 87% of over-ear headphones we've measured.
Measured on 61 of the 239 we've cataloged.
A 4.8 puts its audio quality in the top 10% of over-ear headphones we've measured.
Measured on 44 of the 239 we've cataloged.
Would not buy it again and still uses it daily.
Owned 1–6 months.
below average for over-ear headphones — based on 157 of 239 we've cataloged.
Usb-c is the most common — on 88% of the 136 over-ear headphones we've cataloged (of 239).
5.3 appears on 26% of the 148 over-ear headphones we've cataloged (of 239).
Bluetooth appears on 44% of the 239 over-ear headphones we've cataloged (of 239).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 7.5 |
| 25 | 8.5 |
| 32 | 8.9 |
| 40 | 8.6 |
| 50 | 7.8 |
| 63 | 7.1 |
| 80 | 6.3 |
| 100 | 5.4 |
| 125 | 4.5 |
| 160 | 2.7 |
| 200 | 1.7 |
| 250 | 1.2 |
| 315 | 0.8 |
| 400 | -0.1 |
| 500 | -0.9 |
| 630 | -0.2 |
| 800 | 0.5 |
| 1000 | 0.0 |
| 1250 | 2.3 |
| 1600 | 3.7 |
| 2000 | 7.3 |
| 2500 | 11.7 |
| 3150 | 11.2 |
| 4000 | 8.7 |
| 5000 | 8.5 |
| 6300 | 5.3 |
| 8000 | 0.9 |
| 10000 | 10.0 |
| 12500 | 1.0 |
| 16000 | 3.4 |
| 20000 | -6.7 |
Passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | 0.1 |
| 26 | -1.2 |
| 33 | 0.9 |
| 41 | 1.3 |
| 52 | 0.2 |
| 65 | 0.3 |
| 82 | -0.5 |
| 103 | -1.4 |
| 130 | -1.8 |
| 163 | -2.8 |
| 205 | -1.5 |
| 259 | 3.0 |
| 325 | 9.8 |
| 410 | 12.7 |
| 516 | 16.6 |
| 613 | 15.7 |
| 772 | 20.2 |
| 972 | 22.7 |
| 1220 | 22.7 |
| 1540 | 28.7 |
| 1940 | 32.5 |
| 2440 | 32.4 |
| 3070 | 35.3 |
| 3870 | 38.7 |
| 4870 | 48.6 |
| 6130 | 47.5 |
| 7720 | 54.9 |
| 9720 | 45.7 |
| 12200 | 40.5 |
| 15400 | 39.7 |
| 19400 | 41.2 |
Total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | -1.7 |
| 26 | -10.0 |
| 33 | 5.0 |
| 41 | 11.7 |
| 52 | 17.1 |
| 65 | 23.9 |
| 82 | 26.1 |
| 103 | 21.7 |
| 130 | 26.3 |
| 163 | 30.3 |
| 205 | 31.4 |
| 259 | 34.8 |
| 325 | 32.8 |
| 410 | 26.7 |
| 516 | 24.8 |
| 613 | 20.5 |
| 772 | 25.4 |
| 972 | 27.8 |
| 1220 | 23.1 |
| 1540 | 23.3 |
| 1940 | 29.7 |
| 2440 | 33.7 |
| 3070 | 34.5 |
| 3870 | 38.2 |
| 4870 | 45.7 |
| 6130 | 48.9 |
| 7720 | 54.0 |
| 9720 | 41.3 |
| 12200 | 40.9 |
| 15400 | 40.1 |
| 19400 | 40.9 |
Multi-Dimensional Audio Quality Scores (1–5), modeled from the measured response. Higher is better across timbre, distortion, and immersiveness — add other models to see where this one lands.
The verdict
The Sony WH-1000XM6 is every bit a worthy successor to Sony's other ANC headphones as you'd hope. They sound very good, have excellent ANC, and are equipped to handle demanding users. However, the lack of cutting-edge connection options might be an issue as the years go by.
✓Liked: Excellent ANC, Good sound quality, Excellent microphone, Device compatibility
✕Could be better: No USB listening, No ingress protection rating, Price
What a reader who owns the Sony WH-1000XM6 reports after living with it. Owner-reported, checked before publishing; ordered photo-verified first, then newest.
Owner notes are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not edited by us. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from notes.
1 owner note
Every author writes under a generated pseudonym. A signed-in author’s email is never shown. Read more · A moderator saw a photo of this reader’s unit and it matched the product. Proof of possession, not purchase — and the photo was deleted after the check. Read more · Owned 1–6 months · Still using it: yes, daily · Posted
Would not buy againDidn't research much, but the earcups being very shallow was something i regret
See how the Sony WH-1000XM6 stacks up against the competition.
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 WirelessVSVersusSony WH-1000XM6 vs Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 WirelessWhat do you get for $50 more with the Sony WH-1000XM6? We compare both flagship headphones to find out.Read comparison ›
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony 1000X The CollexionVSVersusSony WH-1000XM6 vs Sony 1000X The CollexionSony’s WH-1000X The Collexion costs far more than the WH-1000XM6, but the differences may surprise you.Read comparison ›
Sony WH-1000XM6
Apple AirPods Max 2VSVersusSony WH-1000XM6 vs Apple AirPods Max 2There's a $100 gap between these two flagships. Here's whether it's worth it — and which direction it cuts.Read comparison ›Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.




1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort over long sessions — as expected





0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · 1 photo-verified
Battery in real life — better than expected


