

Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4
0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations
All products featured are independently chosen by us. However, SoundGuys may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links. See our ethics statement.
1 / 7At 8.2, its noise cancelling beats 68% of wireless earbuds we've measured.
Measured on 88 of the 259 we've cataloged.
No one has reported on this one yet.
Be the first. We ask a few quick questions about living with it, then check the review before publishing.
Own the Beats Powerbeats Fit?
Be the first owner to write in — three answers, four quick reads, shown under a pseudonym. Sign-in needed to publish.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 243 of 259 we've cataloged.
below average for wireless earbuds — based on 241 of 259 we've cataloged.
IPX4 is the most common — on 36% of the 239 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 259).
Active is the most common — on 60% of the 175 wireless earbuds we've cataloged (of 259).
Objective measurements from the SoundGuys test lab — overlay other models to see how this one compares.
Measured frequency response (dB relative) against the SoundGuys Headphone Preference Curve. When the measurement goes above the dashed line, that frequency is louder than our preference curve, and when it goes below: it's quieter. Use the curve for comparison purposes only, as your taste may vary.
| Frequency (Hz) | Response (dB) |
|---|---|
| 20 | 5.3 |
| 25 | 7.4 |
| 32 | 8.0 |
| 40 | 7.6 |
| 50 | 6.5 |
| 63 | 4.9 |
| 80 | 3.1 |
| 100 | 1.1 |
| 125 | -0.8 |
| 160 | -2.8 |
| 200 | -3.5 |
| 250 | -3.9 |
| 315 | -3.6 |
| 400 | -3.2 |
| 500 | -2.9 |
| 630 | -2.1 |
| 800 | -0.9 |
| 1000 | 0.1 |
| 1250 | 2.2 |
| 1600 | 4.8 |
| 2000 | 7.7 |
| 2500 | 11.8 |
| 3150 | 10.7 |
| 4000 | 6.9 |
| 5000 | 6.7 |
| 6300 | 7.7 |
| 8000 | 5.5 |
| 10000 | -5.0 |
| 12500 | -0.7 |
| 16000 | -4.5 |
| 20000 | -16.6 |
Passive isolation (dB) with ANC off — how much ambient noise the fit blocks on its own. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | -7.3 |
| 26 | -0.9 |
| 33 | 1.5 |
| 41 | 1.7 |
| 52 | 2.1 |
| 65 | 2.2 |
| 82 | 2.8 |
| 103 | 3.2 |
| 130 | 3.8 |
| 163 | 3.0 |
| 205 | 4.5 |
| 259 | 5.4 |
| 325 | 8.9 |
| 410 | 10.4 |
| 516 | 8.8 |
| 613 | 8.8 |
| 772 | 11.7 |
| 972 | 14.8 |
| 1220 | 18.5 |
| 1540 | 20.4 |
| 1940 | 23.8 |
| 2440 | 28.1 |
| 3070 | 27.4 |
| 3870 | 21.0 |
| 4870 | 13.0 |
| 6130 | 23.6 |
| 7720 | 32.6 |
| 9720 | 34.5 |
| 12200 | 33.0 |
| 15400 | 43.0 |
| 19400 | 24.3 |
Total attenuation (dB) with ANC on — passive isolation plus active noise cancelling. Higher on the chart means more attenuation.
| Frequency (Hz) | Total attenuation (dB) |
|---|---|
| 21 | -7.0 |
| 26 | -1.3 |
| 33 | 10.8 |
| 41 | 18.7 |
| 52 | 26.5 |
| 65 | 35.3 |
| 82 | 37.0 |
| 103 | 39.2 |
| 130 | 32.6 |
| 163 | 24.4 |
| 205 | 30.9 |
| 259 | 26.6 |
| 325 | 29.7 |
| 410 | 25.4 |
| 516 | 21.8 |
| 613 | 21.3 |
| 772 | 26.1 |
| 972 | 28.3 |
| 1220 | 24.0 |
| 1540 | 18.5 |
| 1940 | 18.3 |
| 2440 | 24.0 |
| 3070 | 25.4 |
| 3870 | 18.8 |
| 4870 | 12.8 |
| 6130 | 21.0 |
| 7720 | 23.5 |
| 9720 | 32.3 |
| 12200 | 33.7 |
| 15400 | 42.4 |
| 19400 | 22.9 |
The verdict
The Powerbeats Fit are mediocre workout earbuds. While they aren't terrible earbuds, you can get more bang for your buck if you look elsewhere.
✓Liked: ANC, Battery life, Works with iOS and Android
✕Could be better: No heart-rate sensor, Only one size of wingtips, Not waterproof, Outdated H1 chip
Nobody who owns the Beats Powerbeats Fit has written in yet.
Owner reviews are not paid for, not solicited from specific owners, and not rewritten by us: at most we proofread typos, which is shown on the review’s own page and which the author can undo. The commission SoundGuys may earn on this page comes from retail links, never from owner reviews.
Own the Beats Powerbeats Fit?
Three answers, four quick reads, one sentence nobody tells you before buying. Shown under a pseudonym. Sign-in needed to publish.
What readers ask about the Beats Powerbeats Fit, answered by the people who own it.
Nobody has asked the owners yet.
Ask the first question →Video reviews and comparisons for this product.
Commentary and deep dives from the SoundGuys editorial team.


0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations

2 of 2 would buy again
2 owners · owners report ~10 h per charge vs 8.73 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
The battery beat their expectations




0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Comfort beat their expectations


0 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
Expected more from the noise cancelling


1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner
The battery beat their expectations

1 of 1 would buy again
1 owner · owners report ~7 h per charge vs 10 h claimed
Comfort beat their expectations
