Beats has been one of the most popular brands in audio for a while now, and that’s in no small part due to the success of the Beats Solo line of headphones (and marketing). The original Solo headphones sold like hot cakes and the Beats Solo 2 did the same, but are they worth picking up now in 2019 when there are so many other obvious options available?
Editor’s note: This post was updated on December 26th, 2019 to include links to helpful information and reflect pricing changes.
What’s In The Box?
This has always been a style-focused brand, and that influences the box as much as it does the headphones themselves. Slide off the outer portion of the box, and the box that contains the headphones is solid red, aside from a slight bit of embossed branding on the very front. Open up the box, and the first thing you’ll see is the soft carrying case. The headphones themselves are already inside the case, and everything else is underneath. You’ll get a 3.5 mm audio cable, carabiner, and a packet containing the manual, warranty info, and of course a sticker.
How are the Beats Solo 2 headphones built?
The Beats Solo 2 headphones come in a variety of colors. For this review, we’re looking at them in blue, though black, white, silver, red, and pink are also available. The finish is very shiny, though it didn’t seem to attract nearly as many fingerprints as I initially thought it would. Still, if you want these to look their best, you might want to keep a microfiber cloth handy to keep them clean. These headphones also feature no visible screws and use a flush hinge design.
The inside of the headband has a very nice feel, almost like leather, though it’s clearly plastic. Putting them on, the Beats Solo 2 are fairly comfortable, though the fit was definitely snug. It wasn’t enough to be uncomfortable, though your mileage may vary. If you’re thinking about picking these up, you might want to see if you can try a pair on first just to see if you can deal with the tight fit.
After an hour or two, the headphones felt less comfortable than they had at first, but after a five-minute break I was able to resume wearing them and they felt comfortable again. Though they don’t feel brittle, the Beats Solo 2 are far from the most flexible-feeling headphones we’ve tried.
How’s the connection strength?
If you’re looking for Bluetooth, you’re going to need to check out the newer Solo3 (which I’ll get into later), as the only connectivity you’ll find in the Beats Solo 2 is the 3.5 mm audio cable with built-in mic and remote. Luckily, unlike a few other brands out there, the cable uses standard 3.5mm jacks on both ends instead of any proprietary connections. So on the off chance that the cable dies on you, you can easily replace it with another cable.
The built-in remote is of the three-button variety, though how much functionality it offers depends on the device you’re using. Only the middle button works on Android devices, providing the same functionality as a one-button “clicker” style remote. If, however, you use an iOS device, all the buttons will function as expected. Call quality was fine with the built-in mic, though these probably aren’t a pair of headphones you’ll want to wear for making calls around the office.
How do the Beats Solo 2 sound?
Plenty of self-styled audiophiles like to look down on the audio quality of Beats headphones, as is always the case with popular companies. For quite a while, there was some good reasoning for that, but lately the company has been making quite a few steps in the right direction, and as a result, the sound quality of the Beats Solo 2 is not to be dismissed easily. Keyword: easily, because it can still be dismissed considering how expensive these are.
In testing I played CDs and lossless audio files from a computer through a Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 audio interface for purposes of testing fidelity. Though it would be an odd choice for such a style-focused brand to ignore mobile devices, I also streamed songs from Rdio on my Moto X to make sure that volume was adequate. It was.
(Editor’s note: Wow, Rdio and Moto X phones. Good times.)
One of the main things Beats headphones are known for is boomy, overpowering bass. That is not the case with the Solo 2. While bass is certainly strong and well represented, it doesn’t overpower the mids as was the case with older headphones from this company. Bass also seems to be focused lower on the frequency scale, rather than the focus on the 100–500 Hz range, which can lead to unpleasant masking of deeper vocals.
The mids are slightly scooped, but not nearly as much as I was expecting from my experience with older Beats headphones. Overall, the midrange is open, though depending on the song, I did notice the occasional touch of harshness in the upper mids.
The highs sound slightly rolled off, though not so much as to lead to a muffled sound. Cymbals and other high end details are well represented, but it sounds like the absolute highest highs are subdued to make for a more pleasant listening experience.
Soundstage is decent — nothing felt closed in, though I was never surprised by the sound either. Overall this is a nice sounding pair of headphones that eschews absolute accuracy for a more hyped sound with more of an emphasis on the low end of the frequency range. The sound is somewhat “excited,” with clear emphasis on the lows and highs, though they don’t go anywhere close to as far as older Beats headphones did.
If you’re worried about angering your immediate neighbors while cranking your tunes on the Beats Solo 2, don’t be. Sound leakage is almost nonexistent here. The headphones also do a good job of keeping out outside sounds, though obviously no active noise cancellation is present.
What about the Beats Solo3 Wireless?
In the time since the Solo 2 headphones were released, a lot has happened. Not only has Apple released the Beats Solo3 Wireless, but they’ve released a few other Beats products as well including a pair of active noise cancelling over ears, on-ears, and even a pair of true wireless earbuds.
If you like the idea of the Solo 2 headphones but wanted an updated version of some modern specs, then the Solo3 Wireless headphones are the ones to go for. These have a few notable improvements like the addition of Bluetooth, playback controls built into the headphones, and Apple’s W1 chip which allows for easier setup and a better connection with iOS devices. With a wireless connection comes other issues, like the fact that they need a battery that can then eventually die. Luckily, the battery life of the Solo3 is superb, at around 30-40 hours of constant playback depending on the output of your music.
If you’re more into earbuds, there’s also the Powerbeats Pro that you should check out. While these are definitely more expensive than the Solo2, they’re also smaller, sound better, and (let’s be honest) have a way higher cool factor because of their true wireless abilities. You’ll get around 10 hours of constant playback here as well as a more refined Beats sound. So while the low end is still emphasized, it isn’t to the exaggerated amount that previous Beats products are known for. Plus, they’re sweat-resistant so you can wear them to the gym if you want to.
The Beats Solo 2 are a solid pair of headphones if you’re looking for Beats. But in a world where solid, good sounding headphones are a dime a dozen and this particular pair costs quite a bit more than a dime, they’ve got to do more and, in a way, they do. The Solo 2 are a good pair of Beats headphones, but they’re still Beats. Even at the refurbished prices that these are showing up with, you’re probably better off getting something else. If you have to have Beats, it’s worth saving a little extra and just going with the Solo3 Wireless.
Disclosure: We may receive affiliate compensation in connection with your purchase of products via links on this page. Even though we may receive compensation, we always give our honest opinions, findings, beliefs, or experiences on each product. See our ethics policy for more details.