Michael @lively_marimba_49
Contributor50 ptsReaders
126all time
126 this month so far
16% of the median#78 of 86 members
Owner reviews
1published
1 Wireless Earbuds
level with the median#17 of 86 members
Avg read time
11sper reader
last 90 days · 126 timed readers
85% of the median#56 of 82 reviewers
First on the product
0products
0% of the median
Readers board #78 of 82
- #77MM
Márton Méhesi-Melis @vivid_aurora_15152+26 ahead
- #78MMichael @lively_marimba_49126Michael
- #79HShonest_sitar_72123−3 behind
26 readers behind Márton Méhesi-Melis.
Readers
Since Nov 2026lively_marimba_49’s Nothing Ear (a) owner review has reached 126 readers since Nov 11, about 126 a day. The community median for a single review is 568.
Per month
Nov so far · 126lively_marimba_49’s review went live Nov 11.
| Month | Readers | Average time spent reading |
|---|---|---|
| November 2026 | 126 | 11s |
Last 14 days
126 readersBest day Nov 12 · 112 readers · Today so far · 5
Time spent reading
lively_marimba_49’s Nothing Ear (a) review holds readers for 11s on average.
Points & rank
- All time
- #81 of 86
- November
- #25 of 31
Where the points came from
Readers by owner review
all time- Nothing Ear (a)Earbuds · Nov 11 · no photo yet126~126 / day · 11s read
Owner DNA appears after 3 owner reviews.
Do other owners agree?
Same verdict 1 time out of 3
Would they buy it again — lively_marimba_49 vs the other owners of the same gear. Owners usually agree 62% of the time.
1 differ
- Nothing Ear (a)Noise cancelling in the real world: worse for them, as expected for the other owners.
They: wouldn’tOthers: 2 of 3 wouldDIFFER
Month by month
- Nov 2026 · so farJoined · 1 owner review · Nothing Ear (a)126 readers+50 pts · #25
Points and ranks for past months are recalculated from today’s data and can shift if a review or vote is removed.
